We research, construct and monitor portfolios as
part of our service proposition. There are many factors we consider when we
develop these and I just wanted to consider one aspect of developing portfolios
and put this into the context of “DIY” investments.
“DIY” investing is being heavily promoted at the
moment as the solution to not having a financial planner. This made me consider
a period nearly 15 years ago when we all thought DIY was the solution to those
jobs we needed doing in the house. Perhaps we could start with a little
decorating but as the confidence grew we progressed to installing that kitchen
we had always promised ourselves.
Of course by cutting out the builder we would save
money. For some of us the end result was something to be proud off, but
possible for a larger proportion the end result was a disaster which required
an expert to come in and clean up the mess. The end result was that we ended up
paying more by the time the mess was cleaned up.
A lot of what we read around investing is that it
is easy; we can go to a direct platform and save money. The problem is that
there is an element of bias on the products and solutions they promote and little
guidance on goal setting. If you are going to go direct to some extent you
would be better to go to a plain vanilla platform which doesn’t promote
anything.
So how does this apply to portfolio construction?
We regularly monitor and review the portfolios we offer to clients. One recent
exercise I carried out was to look at the correlation between all the funds in
the portfolios. So, by this I mean that if two funds have a correlation close
to one they are likely to behave in a similar way, on the opposite side of the
coin if the two funds have opposite correlations then they are going to behave
differently.
This isn’t an exact science and there are other
factors to consider but it helps to draw up a picture. So for example, for more
cautious portfolios I would expect to see a tilt towards opposite correlations
compared to more adventurous portfolios. The reason being is that you still
want growth but you want to reduce the volatility and bring in an element of
stability.
I am pleased to say once I had coloured in the
chart the portfolios are set up as I would expect. This made me think about DIY
investing, if we are sold products and funds then actually we are in danger of
developing a portfolio which could be extremely high risk because we haven’t
done our research, or based our research on what is shown in the sales material.
If we go back to putting in that bathroom preparation is the key, we need a
plan, and we need to ensure we have all the tools to deliver that plan.
To do this we need to do a lot of research and it
may be that we pay a little more to do that. This approach is no different to
DIY investing. If we are going to put together a portfolio of assets we need to
consider the volatility of the assets when put together, the correlation
between them and even something about the fund managers themselves. Once we
have done the research we then need to constantly monitor and follow the funds
to identify any potential changes which may impact on what we are doing.
In summary there is a place for both direct and
advised investing, but if you are going direct then preparation is the key, cut
through the sales material, consider your goals and the then how you will
achieve these goals. And if this seems a daunting task then go and seek help.
No comments:
Post a Comment